Ortiz against a
righty (Fernando Rodney) stood a much better chance of plating the tying run
than Napoli (a righty) so it did increase the chances of Rodney closing out
that inning. But walking Ortiz put the winning run on, meaning a double would
have a high chance of getting that winning run home (a fast runner in Iglesias
and with 2 outs he would be going on contact). Ortiz to walk-off would’ve
needed a homer – against righties this year he’s hit 15 HR in 243 plate
appearances. ‘Na-po-li’ in 284 PA has only 11 homers, but also 2 triples and 19
doubles as well. I can’t see how this move increased Tampa’s chance of winning,
although I’ll leave the exact calculation to Fangraphs and the like.
Maddon has a history
of this – a few years back (2008) when playing against the Rangers he
intentionally walked in a run by walking Josh Hamilton (who was awesome back
then) with the bases loaded to make it 7-4 and bring the winning to the plate
in Marlon Byrd. Byrd was no Hamilton but was having a good year and had hit a
walk-off grand slam a week before AFAIK. And to tie the game he only needed a
double (which would likely do it), while Hamilton needed a home run. Byrd hit
42 extra-base hits (doubles, triples, homers) compared to Hamilton hitting 32
homers (in 50% more AB’s).
One of the things the
Sox commentators said was that he done it because ‘he didn’t want Ortiz to beat
him’. Which is a silly thing in my mind – how crazy is that? If you think about
I’d much rather get beaten by the better player – I mean, given the choice I’d
much rather get beaten by Miguel Cabrera than by Yuniesky Betnacourt. Although admittedly Maddon
No comments:
Post a Comment